Portfolio Project A Case of Nestle

Cotton Industry Essays

Cotton Industry Essays Cotton Industry Essay Cotton Industry Essay Cotton Industry Through the beginning of evolution of humans one of the most common utilities used were cotton for clothing and other things. As trading became popular through Asia and machines were invented the owners would usually use many workers and get a low wage out of their work just as in Japan and India. The cotton industries throughout Japan and India became a great success in the period 1880s to the 1930s. A similarity of these countries was that they both recruited laborers who worked at farms. A difference between these two countries were the type of workers they had working for their cotton industries. Another difference was their production of Yarn. An additional type of document could have been about further explanation of the production of yarn of both cotton industries of Japan and India. First of all, Japan and India mostly had farm workers who worked in the cotton industry. As in for Japan, they would recruit farm laborers because they were cheap workers. These farmers would usually send their children to work at the cotton industries. Usually the worker would earn enough for them to live (Doc. 5). However, even though they would get a low income in working at the cotton industries, they would get a greater amount of wage of a year than working as a farmer. During the 1900, they had to turn over sixty percent of the crops they grew to the landlord. So at to their advantage they had cotton industries (Doc. 4). As well in India, they had workers from agriculture programs and also they had unemployed hand weavers. They usually worked for less than two year and their wages never increased nor decreased, it would usually stay the same (Doc. ). Also, even as were they’re workers had come from were the same, the type of sex was a huge difference. In Japan, they had a higher percentage of workers who were women than in India. During the 1920 the percentage of Female cotton workers was eighty percent which increased to eighty point sixty percent in the year 1930. In India their percentage in the year 1909 was a twent y-two point one percent which decrease to eighteen point nine in the year 1934 (Doc. 7). While Japans use of female cotton workers increased in India their female cotton workers decreased. Furthermore, the female workers in the cotton industries of Japan often were young girls who were sent from families to help them survive. They would always work from morning till dark; however their first year working they did not get payed till their second year and so forth. Unlike India, in Japan, the cotton workers would get an increase in their pay each year starting off with 35 yen (Doc. 3). Last, mostly in India their workers had to work standing up and weaving using the machines. In Japan, they were capable of sitting down and weave using machines or handmade. Last, India’s yarn production differed from Japan’s yarn production. Another difference of India was that they not only made yarn but also produced cloth. This was because throughout India there seemed to be a competition of the machine manufactures which cause local textiles of making their manufactures a huge success through shareholders, investors, and financiers (Doc. 6). Also, the production of cotton yarn and cloth in India through the years 1884 to 1914 seemed to increase except for their hand spun yarn that went from one-hundred fifty millions of pounds to ninety millions of pounds. For the machine spun yarn it began with one-hundred fifty-one million of pounds increasing to six-hundred fifty-two million of pounds. Furthermore, for Hand-woven cloth one thousand millions of yards started off increasing to one thousand four hundred five millions of yards. As for, machine-made cloth, it began with two hundred thirty-eight increasing to one thousand one hundred forty (Doc. 1). In Japan, they had a lower production of yarn and they did not make cotton cloth just simply yarn. In the year 1884, five millions of pounds were made both hand spun and machine spun. In the year 1894, they had quickly increase to one hundred seventeen millions of pounds. Last, through to the year 1914, they had made six hundred sixty-six millions of pounds of yarn. In conclusion, using farm workers to work for the countries Japan and India was a similarity they had especially how farm workers were peasants. However, the differences of their workers were that Japan had a greater percentage of female workers than India had. Statistics had showed that the used of female worked in India decreased while the use of female workers increased in Japan. Japan and India also differed of each other of their roduction or yarn especially of the percentages. Of the yarn, there is lack of information and there should have been another necessary document of why Japan did not produce cloth and how long it took to make it. Other of the differences and similarities, another purpose of the things the author gave was to show how cruel the things were before and how much the peasants h ad to work with little amount of payment. His reason might have been that he informed us this because the author wanted to show how it was before to reflect on how much things have changed from before to now.